hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Monday, May 23, 2022
Little talk: *** Brain Injury of a System Architect My dad died, November 27, 2021. It's pretty shattering. But we are grateful that he made it to 80 years, 8 months. The two qualities of his that I admire most are his fighting spirit, and his mental strength. I don't know where my dad's ability to compartmentalize came from. No one else in my family has it, or had it. But it seems to me a somewhat rare and valuable gift. On the last night my dad was alive, the last thing my mother said to him was a Tamil phrase which means, roughly, "I am going. I will come back." It seems to me at once an everyday, matter of fact phrase, and at the same time a statement of deep theological hope: I am going. I will come back. *** notes on technical reading zeroth pass: skimming, scanning, surveying first pass: reading second pass: working through examples (if any) third pass: working through review questions (if any) fourth pass: working through exercises (if any) last pass: reflection, review, synopsis, summary, notes, highlights, commentary. two books on the top of the pile, one for first-pass reading, one for nth-pass working. current books on the top of my pile: 1) Introducing Python (working) 2) Javascript: The Definitive Guide (reading) tentative opinion on the right speed for first-pass reading: absolute max: 2 chapters in 1 day absolute min: 1 chapter in 8 days comfortable min: 1 chapter in 4 days comfortable max: 1 chapter in 1 day golden mean: between one-third and two-thirds of a chapter a day On days when I try to get through as much reading as possible, this seems to be the pattern: 1. Start reading in the middle of a chapter, and finish that chapter. 2. Start another chapter, and with some difficulty, finish it. 3. Start a third chapter. 4. At some point during the third chapter, my brain will reliably turn to mush. Hence, the opinion: absolute max: 2 chapters in 1 day. My opinions on the right speed for first-pass reading are related to my opinions on the right amount of cardio to do on the treadmill or elliptical. treadmill: absolute max: 16 km in 1 day absolute min: 1 km in 1 day comfortable min: 2-3 km in 1 day comfortable max: 8-10 km in 1 day golden mean: 4-6 km in 1 day elliptical: absolute min: 12 minutes in 1 day comfortable min: 24 to 36 minutes in 1 day comfortable max: 96 to 120 minutes in 1 day absolute max: 192 minutes in 1 day golden mean: 48 to 72 minutes in 1 day It is not news to me that I have often attempted to read too much, the mental equivalent of the alka-seltzer ad. It is perhaps news to me that I have often attempted to read too quickly. In hindsight, it seems obvious that trying to read a difficult chapter in one hour will be hellish; trying to read it in one day will be unpleasant; but if you have the patience to give yourself two or four or eight days, the reading will be at the very least not hellish, and perhaps even positively pleasant. One of my dad's favorite movie lines is from Patton, written, if you believe the lamestream media, by Francis Ford Coppola and Edmund H. North: "I don't like to pay for the same real estate twice." By trying to read too quickly, and not being willing to throttle my technical reading rate to a much more deliberate speed, I have perhaps wound up paying for the same real estate, not just twice, but dozens of times. Oh well. Let's hope the view from the heights makes it all worth it. *** Big talk: *** James Sinegal: The Camel (in the eye of the needle) So how did James Sinegal do it? How did he manage to stay so normal, despite being so rich? *** The eye popping inflation numbers seem to have dented policymakers confidence, which seems to me unfortunate, and unwarranted. The plan was to run the economy hot, until 2019 levels of employment and output had been recovered. If the vaccines had ended the pandemic, it might have been the right policy. But the vaccines did not end the pandemic. So at some point over the past two years, it has become clear that some of the covid-induced changes to the economy have become permanent, and 2019 is never coming back. This is a bitter pill to swallow, and one of the side-effects of that pill is that increased demand resulted in higher prices, instead of more output. A non-ideal income. But the policy to attempt to recover 2019 levels of employment and output was the right one, in my opinion. Throttling demand might be a legitimate response to that inflation. But supply-side interventions also seem to me legitimate. And moral-suasion also seems to me legitimate. If John F Kennedy could call out corporate greed, why can't Elizabeth Warren? It is appropriate for progressives to ask policymakers not to fire the disinflation gun until they have seen the whites of inflation's eyes. If the policymakers respond that at this point, we are not only seeing the whites of inflation's eyes, but are at this very moment tasting an inflation knuckle sandwich, that seems reasonable to me. *** Like the husband who should not apologize until he knows what he is apologizing for, it seems to me the Biden administration should not cancel student loan debt until they know why they are doing it. (hint: it's not because people with student loan debt are greedy and unreasonable) One policy that might make sense is to shift from a debt-based system to an equity-based system (For example, offer $30,000 of student loan debt relief for every 1% of future earnings). But it needs to be done in a way that minimizes hassle, and in a way that accepts that some of the money is not going to be repaid, which Obama-era policies did not do. *** Next post: June 22, 2022
|