hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Thursday, December 29, 2022
Little Talk: *** Seven walks for seven brothers On November 14, I started the Waterdog Challenge, though initially I was not aware of it (Waterdog is a nearby lake). The rules for the challenge, as they evolved: 1. Seven different routes for walks near Waterdog Lake, the shortest of which is worth 1 point, the longest of which is worth 4.5 points (1 point equals about 40 minutes of walking) 2. 1 point for every 3 km on the treadmill 3. 1 point for every 48 minutes on the elliptical After a few days of walking, the goal I set for myself was 180 points, and so far I have not had a reason to cut it short, or stretch it out. I am currently at 144.5 points, perhaps an average of slightly less than 3 points a day. I think I assumed that once I started trail walking, I would stop using the elliptical, or the treadmill. But somewhat to my surprise, I found I really liked the combination of television + elliptical. Televison + treadmill is also not bad, but I perhaps found it too easy to pick up blisters when trying to combine the two. Perhaps I will try to replace the treadmill with an exercise bike. Another, not exactly surprise, but clarification, was the discovery of my ideal routine, in the context of the challenge: 1. Foot hits the trail: Half past nine-ish. The earliest I managed to hit the trail was seven. The latest, while still managing to actually hit the trail, was perhaps 12. Therefore the ideal, canonical time to hit the trail was perhaps half-past nine. 2. Foot quits the trail: Half past one-ish. Three hours walking + one hour mooching, malingering, moseying and meandering equals four hours on the trail. I rarely spent four hours on the trail. But sometimes I did. 3. Foot hits the machine: Half past three-ish. I very rarely managed to hit the machine by half-past three. But I generally started to think about hitting the machine around then. And, of course, machines, unlike trails, do not have a deadline for daylight. 4. Foot quits the machine: Five-ish. 98 minutes on the machine equals 2 points, and 2 episodes of a 50 minute TV show, or perhaps one World Cup football match, which is a satisfying amount of television to watch, in the context of exercising. I also remember a Peter O'Toole marathon, where I worked through a Lawrence of Arabia DVD over a few days, then a Becket DVD, over a few days more. Incidentally, Becket's attitude towards Brother John seems to me the correct attitude for complacent middle-age to have towards non-complacent youth. I think I have wanted to do something like this challenge for at least the past five years. Possibly I have wanted to do something like this for as far back as 30 years ago. At least, in 1993, I have a memory, of waking up very early, going for, not a long walk, but a short jog, and then coming back home to watch the French Open on early morning TV. I think, back then, in 1993, I kept up that routine for two or three days. *** How much web-surfing does a man require? My current answer: Several peeks, two of them named, and two pokes. Peek #1: Dawn Peek #2: Dusk Poke #1: Noon (Morning / Afternoon) Poke #2: Night (Evening / Night) *** I was unable to donate a Poirot DVD until I had first re-watched the scene where Poirot eats a hand-made chocolate. Perhaps because I know my dad liked that scene as well. When we watched it, my dad made the point that the way Poirot enjoyed the chocolate made the chocolate-maker feel good, and appreciated. *** Next post: January 29, 2023 |