hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Monday, June 26, 2023
Little Talk: *** Waterdog Challenge III : The End of Dogwalker I ended the Waterdog Challenge in late April, on around 250 points. On the last day of the challenge, I got a late start, around 12:30. I moseyed, and moseyed, and moseyed some more. I took some pictures, to make it last longer. Then, by around 4:45, I was done. *** How Much Mitigation For Phone Addiction Does A Man Require? My current answer: 1. Tether the phone before eating anything in the morning 2. Don't untether the phone (for the most part) until you have eaten all the things in the evening. Good reasons to untether the phone: 1. Taking pictures. 2. Chatting. 3. Listening. *** How Much Cardio Does A Man Require? My current answer: types of cardio sessions: warm-up: 0-10 minutes short: 10-30 minutes medium: 30-60 minutes long: 60-100 minutes absolute min: 10 minutes (1 short, 10-30 minutes) comfortable min: 40 minutes (2 short, 20-60 minutes) comfortable default: 90 minutes (2 medium, 60-120 minutes) comfortable max: 160 minutes (2 long, 120-200 minutes) absolute max: 250 minutes (2 long, 2 medium, 180-320 minutes) *** How Much Web-Surfing Does A Man Require? my current answer: One or two peeks, one or two pokes. In terms of label: peek #1: morning poke #1: late afternoon poke #2: evening peek #2: night In terms of time: peek #1: pre-dawn / morning poke #1: morning - evening poke #2 / peek #2: evening / night In terms of content: peek #1: Morning paper. poke #1: Funny papers, plus SMERSH: Light reading, for a late afternoon break. Heavy reading, for a late afternoon . . . refreshment. SMERSH is Howard Simons' immortal phrase for Science, Medicine, Education, Religion, and suchlike. poke #2 / peek #2: Sunday papers: anything and everything. In terms of function: peek #1: before work poke #1: breaks from work poke #2: before turning off the laptop peek #2: before falling asleep *** How Much Media Does A Man Require? my current answer: 1. phone while waking up 2. web for errands and work 3. television while exercising 4. web or television for breaks from work 5. web after work 6. television or radio after work 7. phone while falling asleep *** How Much Work Does A Man Require? my current answer: 1. tether the phone by 9ish 2. work from 9-10ish to 7-8ish By "work", I mean any activity. At the moment, I am liking splitting the day into 3 sessions: morning session: 9:30 - 1:30 afternoon session: 1:30 - 5:30 evening session: 5:30 - 8:15 The evening session, perhaps, is the time for the wicked googly, the doosra, the teesra, the thepla, the carrom ball, the banana inswinger, the reverse swing, the reverse sweep, the french cut, the dilscoop, the nightwatchman, and the give it a heave. Either in art, or in life. 3. short walk, or something similar 4. web, or reading, or television, or radio 5. turn off the laptop 6. reading, or television, or radio Youthful model of productivity: 1. Work day and night till it's done 2. Play day and night till there's some reason to stop playing 3. Rinse, dry out, and repeat. Middle-aged model of productivity 1. Regular hours 2. Modified limited hang outs 3. Breaks for stretching and breathing and naps Truth be told, the middle aged model seems to me to have a lot to recommend it, even for those who are not middle aged. And at some point, of course, it becomes not an option, but a necessity. P.G. Wodehouse:
https://nicklouras.com/2018/05/25/the-daily-routine-of-c-s-lewis/ *** Big Talk: *** My opinion on how to make the university admissions process more joyful: 1. Universities can have minimum admissions criteria, based on achievement, not aptitude. Learn, or learn not. There is no aptitude. 2. Students can apply to departments. The admissions criteria for each department can be a bit quirky and eccentric, based on department staff. Under this system, the football team, or the lacrosse team, can be their own department, with their own admissions criteria, and their own curriculum. The essential thing, it seems to me, is to not encourage the illusion that the admissions process can be perfectly fair, or a perfect measure of capital-M merit. I liked the postscript that RK Narayan suggested should be added to all exam papers: ". . .I would add a postscript to every question paper: `If you cannot answer any of the above questions, don't despair. Remember your examiners are not infallible and may not do better if placed in your predicament. Your inability to answer will in no way be a reflection of your intelligence. We apologize for the embarrassment. Also remember, if you expect a first class and do not secure even passing marks, do not rave against your examiner, he is also a human being subject to fluctuating moods caused by unexpected domestic quarrels or a bad digestion just when he is sitting down to correct your papers; also, not being an adding machine, occasionally he may slip and arrive at 7 while totaling 8 and 3. Please forgive him.'. . ." 3. Students who really want to go to a school, but do not get in, can audit courses, perhaps at the discretion of the teacher, and pay to have their work assessed. And, over time, if their work meets the standard, they can either be admitted, or graduate with some sort of auditor's degree.
|