hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Friday, June 14, 2002
I basically agree with your comments that Democrats can only envy Blair, but in one respect I think they can, or at least could've. I was struck how Blair kept urging the electorate to reject Hague in order to douse the last embers of Thatcherism. He did it so much I felt a bit put off by his beating up on an old woman. I wonder if Gore could have done the same thing, i.e. portraying Bush as a warmed over Ronald Reagan pushing the same big tax cut that didn't work twenty years ago, i.e.: *America*, don't let them do this to you again*. During the time the Republicans were in power, from 1980-1992, middle class take home pay went up [insert figure]. Earnings for the wealthy went up[insert figure] Under Reaganomics, the rich got richer and the middle class got screwed. Under new Democrat policies, the poor have done better, the middle class has done better, and rich have, you know, gone into the stratosphere. There was a business cycle recovery during the 80's too, but over the long term, from 1980-1992, Reaganomics was not good for working people. The question of this election is, are we going to continue to push for broad-based growth that benefits all people, from the lowest to the highest, or are we going to go back to the failed politics of the past, where the wealthy rigged the system for their benefit. *America, don't let them do this to you again* (excerpt of an email I sent the Gore campaign. sigh) Anyway, I was reading this excellent explanation of the health-care debacle in 93-94, which among other things, showed what a jerk Ira Magaziner was. The conventional wisdom is that Magaziner has redeemed himself by chairing some Internet commission, where he basically endorsed standard free-market bromides and did everything that Republican Tom Davis asked him too. If it turns out that the work of the commission is flawed in some way because of its uncritical endorsement of free markets, then I think a pretty good article could be written skewering Magaziner's arrogance-turned-cowardice and the conventional wisdom which is willing to vouch for anyone who praises free markets and deregulation |