hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Friday, June 14, 2002
I heartily agree that Ashcroft deserves to be fought. And I would go one step further, and think we must make it clear that Dems will pay a price if they support Ashcroft's nomination. As far as I can see, the only reason Ashcroft opposed Lee was that he was against affirmative action. Well, Colin Powell supports affirmative action, so isn't it but a step to say: "Do you think supporting affirmative action is a reasonable position?" Either way he's screwed. If he says yes, then he has to answer why he blocked Lee's nomination. If he says no, then he has to face the question "But your own Secretary of State agrees with us. What does it say about your extreme partisanship that you blocked the nomination of someone for holding a position that even Colin Powell agrees with! Would you have voted against the nomination of Colin Powell as well? Why should we trust you to enforce the laws fairly, given this record of zealous extremism and intolerance in the Senate?" Also, I think the Southern Partisan is a dead-end, insofar as I think people should be held responsible only for what they themselves say. If, for example, a liberal Democrat were to give an interview to the Progressive, and the Progressive's next issue was an expose "proving" the CIA was full of genocidal maniacs, I would not want the Democrat held responsible. Hold Ashcroft responsible for his own nutty statements, but not those of others. In general, I think we could make better headway by attacking his intolerance, lack of intellectual integrity, double standards, and flip-flops rather than his conservative positions per se. Here's my favorite sound-bite type line: "There is a minimum threshold of intellectual integrity and non-partisan judgement required for an Attorney General of the United States. Many qualified conservatives would meet and far exceed that threshold: John Danforth, Robert Fiske, Fred Thompson (there must be others! musn't there?) Former senator Ashcroft does not. He is an unacceptably partisan choice for Attorney General, and has given Democrats and moderates many reasons not to trust him to render impartial judgements." |