hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Friday, June 14, 2002
The pro-prosecutors / pro-civil liberties crowds have been duking it out pretty vehemently, and it seems to me, almost entirely needlessly. Isn't there a pretty obvious solution? Namely when it comes to crimes like terrorism let the FBI / Justice / CIA do pretty much anything they damn well please, but their expanded powers to fight terrorism cannot then be subsequently used to collect information to prosecute drug-dealing, tax evasion, purely technical (i.e. careless, unintentional) violations of anti-terrorism laws (e.g. Wen-Ho-Lee), and other less serious crimes. The whole debate seems to be about how far to ratchet down the standard of probable cause, and no one seems to be arguing that the appropriate standard of probable cause depends on the potential seriousness of the crime. You probably know the history better than I do, but it seems relevant that the Bill of Rights was formulated at a time when petty crimes like smuggling were rampant. Or to put it another way, I couldn't care less if the gummint listens to everyone of my conversations from now until judgement day as long as the only subject they were concerned about was whether I was seriously plotting a terrorist attack or not, as opposed to my consumption habits of the finer Jamaican weeds Or at least that's how it looks from the cheap seats. Maybe the debate's actually more nuanced than I give it credit for. It seems petty to even go there, but is there any doubt now about the truth of the White House Vandalism stories? Also I think that Andrew Sullivan attacks on Clinton require a more comprehensive, probably article-length rather than TPM post, response. Probably something that goes beyond the attacks on Clinton and examines the general habit of blaming your opponents for whatever's going wrong. |