hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Friday, June 14, 2002
this a little off the beaten track, but what the hey, you're a history Phd. . . I've just been learning a bit on Lincoln's presidency, (in particular booknotes for David Herbert Donald's biography, PBS, and Clinton's farewell interview with Dan Rather), and it seems to me pretty apparent that Clinton tried to model the style of his presidency after Lincoln's, especially 1) Lincoln's dictum of "net getting out too far in front of the public" and 2) Lincoln's tendency to tell people what they wanted/needed to hear, rather than what he may have truly believed. This seems to be an understandable, but tragic mistake on Clinton's part, and may be an important key to understanding why the primary assessment of Clinton's presidency will likely be "unrealized potential". The reason why Lincoln's style was appropriate for his time was that voters had many strongly held beliefs about polarizing issues which could not be finessed and therefore Lincoln did not try to. In our day voters beliefs are much more squishy, and most issues aren't starkly polarizing, so voters are more amenable to being "manipulated" or "educated" (take your pick). Voter's are also more confused, so they hunger for "authenticity", for straight-talkin' , trustworthy (looking) politticians to "discuss things in ways I can understand". In other words, "not getting too far out in front of the public" is not good advice in our time. The really important political battles in our day are won by *molding* public opinion, not conforming to it. Or to put it another way, in our time how an issue gets "framed" is very important to the final policy result. In Lincoln's time, "framing an issue" has relatively little to do with it. hope things are going well, rv p.s. I strongly doubt the outside Enron investors are connected with the GOP. They will be (I predict) 1) Houstonians or 2) Investment bankers/financial advisors a good article topic would be how to reform the Corporate Tax Code so that the Enron's of the world can stop evading them. |