hard heads soft hearts |
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Saturday, September 14, 2024
Big Talk
***
Suppose you wanted a refugee and asylum system which followed the principle of "we can't take in everyone, but we can and should take in our fair share." What would be America's fair share of the world's refugees and asylum seekers? I suppose one opinion I have is that there should be at least a rough location parity in the system: that is, the location where people apply for refugee or asylum status should not make a big difference in how their application is treated.
An article about Harris I liked: https://prospect.org/politics/2024-07-29-member-congress-worked-kamala-harris-katie-porter/
A post about Harris I liked: The most important thing to me about Harris and Walz, and Biden, is that they are normal politicians, who will say and do things that normal politicians say and do. Things such as: 1) "The children are our future. In this coming economy of ours, nothing is more important than a good education." 2) "We will work to strengthen our alliances with NATO and in the Pacific. America works best when we work together." 3) "We can disagree without being disagreeable. Give and take is essential in a democracy." 4) "We will work to make sure that the future is less racist than the past." 5) "The poor ain't so bad." I liked Harris calling out the politics of division and distraction. I also liked Walz referring to Trump as a "robber baron", or "just another robber baron", putting Trump in historical context, and suggesting what the appropriate policy responses to him might be.
I am neither thrilled nor outraged by the use of the word "weird". I suppose I am a bit glad that the Democrats have found their courage, the courage to point out that the emperor is a little bit starkers, and a little bit barkers. It is perhaps worth pointing out that there is a good weird, and a bad weird.
Good Weird is The Biggest Ball of Twine In Minnesota: https://emschumacher.com/the-biggest-ball-of-twine-in-minnesota/
Bad Weird is sending out blast faxes along the lines of, "COWARDS, We have cast the pearls of truth before swine. Damn you all!”
According to Al Franken's book, this is an actual fax sent by messieurs Olson and Southwell of the Northern Michigan Regional Militia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh_Is_a_Big_Fat_Idiot_and_Other_Observations The weird discussion did remind of two movie scenes, one from Rubin and Ed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL1wl8ZL7Bo
and one from Good Morning, Vietnam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rew_Ts1d7zY "Dick, I've covered for you a lot of times, because I thought you were a little bit crazy. But you're not crazy. You're mean. And this is just radio." If a nation has issues with its immigration system, those issues can be fixed. If there is a shortage of affordable housing, those houses can be built. But the damage that comes from having people caught up in a mob mentality chanting "mass deportations now" might never be fixed. I don't think you have a right to do that to people.
It reminds me of some things Al Gore said in his Abu Graibh speech: https://www.wagingpeace.org/remarks-by-al-gore/
"young soldiers were put in an untenable position. For example, young reservists assigned to the Iraqi prisons were called up without training or adequate supervision, and were instructed by their superiors to “break down” prisoners in order to prepare them for interrogation. To make matters worse, they were placed in a confusing situation where the chain of command was criss-crossed between intelligence gathering and prison administration, and further confused by an unprecedented mixing of military and civilian contractor authority. The soldiers who are accused of committing these atrocities are, of course, responsible for their own actions and if found guilty, must be severely and appropriately punished. But they are not the ones primarily responsible . . . . . . the Judge Advocates General within the Defense Department were so upset and opposed that they took the unprecedented step of seeking help from a private lawyer in this city who specializes in human rights and said to him, “There is a calculated effort to create an atmosphere of legal ambiguity” where the mistreatment of prisoners is concerned."
"Our world is unconquerable because the human spirit is unconquerable, and any national strategy based on pursuing the goal of domination is doomed to fail because it generates its own opposition, and in the process, creates enemies for the would-be dominator." "Listen to the way Israel’s highest court dealt with a similar question when, in 1999, it was asked to balance due process rights against dire threats to the security of its people: I'm not sure I've read a discussion about how the Israeli norms on how to respond to a terrorist attack have changed, and gradually gotten worse, over the past twenty-five years? ***
Little Talk
***
How Much Waking Up Does A Man Require? My current answer:
1. wake up 2. stare out the window a bit 3. get ready, make the bed. Possibly have a book to accompany you, during the long minutes of ready-getting and bed-making. 4. Un-tether the phone, if not un-tethered already. Check whether the sky has fallen. 5. ??? 6. read the newspaper, if you want 7. one last, long, lingering look at the phone, before the re-tethering. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZttdKu6acLc 8. profit! I remember being impressed by Papa's morning routine in Stranger Things 4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=037yf6iJkjQ ***
Next post: March 1, 2025
Comments:
Post a Comment
|