hard heads soft hearts |
|
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 August 2025 October 2025 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Sunday, October 26, 2025
Big Talk
***
About 2 and a half years ago, I picked up an anthology of letters at a used book stall, a few of them historical, most of them sample letters for various situations in life. The book opened with an excerpt from Bennett Cerf's "Laugh Day", about Fiorello La Guardia. I had misplaced the La Guardia excerpt, and don't currently have access to the book, but thanks to the miracle of the Internet Archive, I was able to retrieve it: https://archive.org/details/laughdaynewtreas00cerf
Fiorello's apparent refusal to pull strings to resettle his sister Gemma more quickly, shows a kind of persnickety integrity, an integrity which is currently out of fashion, but which might not be out of fashion forever:
***
Something Michelle Gomez said at a Comic-Con panel that I liked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48wpf0phoxA&t=1771s
***
An article by Masha Gessen, and a quote by Garry Kasparov, that I keep coming back to:
"At first they were using Trump mostly as an icebreaker. They expected Hillary to win and wanted to discredit her completely. Trump was the perfect vehicle for discrediting not only Hillary but the entire electoral system. Putin’s great advantage is that, unlike Soviet propagandists, he is not selling an ideology. I call him the merchant of doubt. His message is, We are shit, you are shit, and all of this is bullshit. What democracy? Trump was the ideal agent of chaos."
I play around a bit with the NEIGHBORS acronym: Not Everything Is BS.
To me, fascism is friends and neighbors being disappeared in the dead of the night. One thing we have unfortunately had cause to learn is that, at the time, it's difficult to tell the difference between people disappearing for ordinary reasons, and people being disappeared for extraordinary reasons. A nation which wishes to nip fascism in the bud must perhaps develop rituals for noticing when people have disappeared, and also rituals for retrieving people, and bringing them back, when appropriate. My fundamental opinion on trans rights, for what it's worth, is that I trust There was an internet comment on one of Natalie Wynn's videos, which I can't find, but which struck me at the time: A woman, perhaps slightly larger and hairier than the average woman, was attacked by a band of roving mean girls, who gleefully informed her that she was not eligible to use the Ladies Rest Room. She left the room in humiliation, and felt bad the rest of the day.
*** I've been thinking a bit about the difference between democratic, community capitalism and undemocratic, psy ops capitalism.
Psy Ops Capitalism:
Extensive monitoring, surveillance and psychological profiling to determine: 1. Who is worth investing in. 2. Who can be safely discarded. 3. Who can be trusted with large amounts of money and power.
Community Capitalism:
1. Everybody is worth investing in. 2. No one can be safely discarded. 3. No one can be trusted with large amounts of money and power.
One of my favorite bits of Andrew Tobias's writing is the "Trust No One" chapter of The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need. Murray, Murray, Murray. http://www.grandtimes.com/insurance.html https://andrewtobias.com/trust-no-one/
Note that while I do believe everybody is worth investing in, I don't necessarily believe everybody is worth investing large amounts of money in. I believe everybody is worth investing small to medium amounts of money in.
*** The speech by Otto Wells opposing the Enabling Act of 1933 is pretty great, and stands the test of time. The parts of it that do not stand the test of time are the attempts to throw Hitler a bone here or there, in order to appear "reasonable". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933
The Centre's Ludwig Kaas spoke to voice his party's support for the bill amid "concerns put aside". He had still not received the written guarantee he had negotiated but had been assured it was being "typed up" . . . Heinrich Brüning remained silent.
***
Little Talk
***
How Much Waking Up Does A Man Require?
1. wake up 4. re-tether the phone, or set a timer (optional) 5. stare out the window some more (optional) 6. get up, stand up, people get ready 7. ??? 8. profit!
***
How Much Tabloid Reading / Web-Surfing Does A Man Require? My current answer:
2-4 quick glances, 1-2 leisurely looks
in terms of time (maybe): quick glance 1, 3: dawn, dusk quick glance 2, 4: midday, midnight leisurely look 1: pre-dawn to dusk leisurely look 2: pre-dusk to dawn
***
Next post: December 29, 2025
Comments:
Post a Comment
|