hard heads soft hearts |
|
|
a scratch pad for half-formed thoughts by a liberal political junkie who's nobody special. ''Hard Heads, Soft Hearts'' is the title of a book by Princeton economist Alan Blinder, and tends to be a favorite motto of neoliberals, especially liberal economists. mobile
Archives
June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 October 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 December 2003 June 2004 September 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 August 2005 January 2006 February 2006 January 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 January 2013 March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 December 2013 February 2014 June 2014 November 2014 August 2015 January 2016 April 2016 April 2017 July 2018 December 2018 September 2019 December 2019 August 2020 January 2021 October 2021 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 December 2022 January 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 September 2024 October 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 August 2025 October 2025 January 2026 Short List: Brad Delong Yahoo Long List: Arthur Silber The Note Arts and Letters Daily Andrew Tobias Daily Howler Talking Points Memo New Republic Armed Liberal Eschaton Eric Alterman Slate Salon TAPPED David Corn (Nation) BuzzFlash Max Sawicky Oliver Willis InstaPundit Patrick Ruffini National Review Weekly Standard Amygdala BartCop Andrew Sullivan Drudge Report Romenesko Media News Matt Yglesias Daily Kos MyDD PLA William Burton Matt Welch CalPundit ArgMax Hullabaloo Pandagon Ezra Klein Paul Krugman Dean Baker TomPaine Progressive Michael Barone James Howard Kunstler Pundits & Editorial Pages NY Times Washington Post LA Times USA Today Washington Times Boston Globe Stanley Crouch Jonah Goldberg Molly Ivins Robert Novak Joe Conason Gene Lyons WSJ Best of the Web Jim Pinkerton Matt Miller Cynthia Tucker Mike Luckovich "What's New" by Robert Park Old Official Paul Krugman New Official Paul Krugman Unofficial Paul Krugman Center on Budget & Policy Priorities Washington Monthly Atlantic Monthly |
Monday, January 19, 2026
Big Talk
***
a slight variant on a previous post:
my current way of looking at the current political conflict: 1. the pro-democracy coalition versus the Jabba coalition
my acronym for the JABBA coalition: Justice Activists are Bootless & Bad, Actually
The pro-democracy coalition wants a system where everybody counts, and everybody has to account. The Jabba coalition does not need to have a coherent agenda, and can merely take credit for anything good, and avoid blame for anything bad. It also merely needs to point out that the pro-democracy people are hypocrites, who made a mess of things when they were in charge.
the Jabba coalition is diverse, but one thing they have in common is an extreme skepticism, bordering on green-eyed cynicism, towards the various kinds of justice activists: social justice activists, environmental justice activists, gender justice activists, racial justice activists, migrant justice activists, trans justice activists, minority justice activists, etc.
Criticism of justice activists is fine, of course. But the Jabbas, for the most part, do not criticize in good faith. They criticize in order to demoralize and discourage the justice activists, and to blur the distinction between justice and injustice.
That attitude of green eyed cynicism is important. One of my favorite movies is Quiz Show, and at one point the Rob Morrow character says "Charlie, if you want to insult me, that's fine, but you can't envy me at the same time." The Jabbas want to have an attitude of contempt towards the justice activists, and some of them manage it. But underneath the contempt is envy, a recognition that the justice activists have a daily beauty in their life, a conviction in things not seen.
And, of course, the Jabba coalition have found Trump to be an acceptable leader, because they recognize that if you want to get revenge on the justice activists, and if you want to vandalize the achievements of the justice activists, then Jabba the Trump is your kind of scum.
But enough about the Jabbas! We have been talking too much about them. We need to find time to talk about better things. Victory for the pro-democracy coalition requires:
3. Assuaging people's anxieties about the dangers of calling out injustice, and the dangers of opposing injustice. 4. Perhaps, a certain . . . je ne sais quoi.
***
Next post: March 1, 2026
Comments:
Post a Comment
|